Implementation of the STAD Cooperative Learning Model to Improve Student Understanding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63687/jscl.v1i2.17Keywords:
Cooperative Learning, STAD, Civics LessonsAbstract
This study addresses the low student understanding and lack of active participation in the learning process, along with the challenge of maintaining motivation during the implementation of the STAD cooperative model. A qualitative approach with model development and classroom action research was used, focusing on grade XI students of SMAN 1 Pasuruan City. Data was collected through field observations and recordings during Civics lessons using the STAD model. The analysis centered on student cooperation, participation, understanding, and teacher effectiveness. The study found that the STAD cooperative model effectively increased student participation, material understanding, and interaction, as evidenced by improvements in formative test scores and group discussions. However, challenges such as sustaining motivation and involvement from both students and teachers need to be addressed with strategies for motivation, active teaching, and effective group management. Regular monitoring is essential to ensure optimal learning and significant improvements in outcomes. This research contributes to the development of cooperative learning, particularly the STAD model, by demonstrating its success in enhancing student engagement and comprehension. The findings highlight the importance of motivation and group management strategies and emphasize the role of continuous monitoring to ensure cooperative learning’s effectiveness and sustainability in educational settings.
References
Adesina, O. O., Adesina, O. A., Adelopo, I., & Afrifa, G. A. (2022). Managing group work: the impact of peer assessment on student engagement. Accounting Education, 32(1), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2022.2034023
Aida, Z. (2023). Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Koperatif Learning Tipe STAD dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kreatifitas Belajar Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Dalam Mata Pelajaran Fiqih:(Studi Eksperimen Pada MTsN Siantar Kabupaten Simalungun). Cybernetics: Journal Educational Research and Social Studies, 4(1), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.51178/cjerss.v4i1.1114
Akhmad, F. (2020). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Teams – Achievement Division (Stad) Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Pemeliharaan Mesin Kendaraan Ringan. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi Otomotif, 2(2), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpvo.v2i2.33554
Amsari, D., Wahyuni, E., & Fadhilaturrahmi, F. (2024). The Social Learning Theory Albert Bandura for Elementary School Students. Jurnal Basicedu, 8(2), 1654–1662. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v8i2.7247
Aningsih, A., Sugiharti, R. E., & Uhrifah, A. (2023). Penerapan Model Kooperatif Tipe STAD (Student Team Achievement Division) untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 7(6), 3602–3615. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i6.6342
Ardiansyah, W., & Ujihanti, M. (2017). Constructivism and Its Perspectives Related to Teaching And Learning Process In The Classroom : A Conceptual Framework. Tarbawy : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 117-143. https://doi.org/10.32923/tarbawy.v4i1.815
Armianti, R., Ndona, Y., & Saragi, D. (2024). Peran Pendidikan Nilai dalam PKn untuk Membentuk Karakter Siswa di Era Digital: The Role of Values PKn to Shape Students’ Character in the Digital Era. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 4(02), 707–716. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v4i02.4719
Atmaja, I. S. W., & Sutikno, S. (2024). Application of the Constructivism Model to Improve Vocabulary and Communication of Class III Students at SPF State Elementary School Number 104244 Jati Sari Lubuk Pakam, Deli Serdang District, School Year 2023-2024. International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE), 3(1), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.55299/ijere.v3i1.803
Caroline, Oroh, O., & Pada, D. (2023). Enhancing Online Learning Experiences through Personalization Utilizing Recommendation Algorithms. International Journal Software Engineering and Computer Science (IJSECS), 3(3), 398–407. https://doi.org/10.35870/ijsecs.v3i3.1852
Cents-Boonstra, M., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., Denessen, E., Aelterman, N., & Haerens, L. (2020). Fostering student engagement with motivating teaching: an observation study of teacher and student behaviours. Research Papers in Education, 36(6), 754–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1767184
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ Questions: A Potential Resource For Teaching And Learning Science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101
Crowe, M., Inder, M., & Porter, R. (2015). Conducting Qualitative Research In Mental Health: Thematic And Content Analyses. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 49(7): 616-623. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867415582053
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2019). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Darling-Hammond, L., Schachner, A. C. W., Wojcikiewicz, S. K., & Flook, L. (2023). Educating teachers to enact the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 28(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2022.2130506
De Felice, S., Hamilton, A. F. C., Ponari, M., & Vigliocco, G. (2023). Learning from others is good, with others is better: the role of social interaction in human acquisition of new knowledge. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 378(1870), 20210357. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0357
Dejene, W. (2019). The Practice Of Modularized Curriculum In Higher Education Institution: Active Learning And Continuous Assessment In Focus. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1611052
Dincă, M., Luştrea, A., Craşovan, M., Oniţiu, A., & Berge, T. (2023). Students’ Perspectives on Team Dynamics in Project-Based Virtual Learning. SAGE Open, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221147269
Fittipaldi, D. (2020). Managing the Dynamics of Group Projects in Higher Education: Best Practices Suggested by Empirical Research. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 1778 - 1796. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080515
Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative Learning: Review of Research and Practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3
Gupta, V., Viswesh, V., Cone, C., & Unni, E. (2020). Qualitative Analysis of the Impact of Changes to the Student Evaluation of Teaching Process. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 84(1), 7110. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7110
Jacob, F., Pez, V., & Volle, P. (2021). Principles, Methods, Contributions, And Limitations Of Design Science Research In Marketing: Illustrative Application To Customer Journey Management. Recherche et Applications En Marketing (English Edition), 37(2), 2-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/20515707211032537
Jamshed, S. (2014). Qualitative Research Method-Interviewing And Observation. Journal Of Basic And Clinical Pharmacy, 5(4), 87–88. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141942
Jumahida, Sulaiman, U., Awaliah Musgamy, Syaparuddin, & Syarif, A. N. (2024). Improving Students’ Learning Of The Material Of The Shahada Sentence Through The Stad Cooperative Learning. AULADUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 11(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.24252/auladuna.v11i1a6.2024
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x
Lim, W. M. (2024). What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
Marco-Fondevila, M., Rueda-Tomás, M., & Latorre-Martínez, M. P. (2022). Active Participation and Interaction, Key Performance Factors of Face-to-Face Learning. Education Sciences, 12(7), 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070429
Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2023). Virtual Reality In Education: A Review Of Learning Theories, Approaches And Methodologies For The Last Decade. Electronics, 12(13), 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132832
Martin-Alguacil, N., Avedillo, L., Mota-Blanco, R., & Gallego-Agundez, M. (2024). Student-Centered Learning: Some Issues and Recommendations for Its Implementation in a Traditional Curriculum Setting in Health Sciences. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1179. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111179
Mebert, L., Barnes, R., Dalley, J., Gawarecki, L., Ghazi-Nezami, F., Shafer, G., … Yezbick, E. (2020). Fostering Student Engagement Through A Real-World, Collaborative Project Across Disciplines And Institutions. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1750306
Megawati, R., Leksono, I., & Harwanto, H. (2021). Implementasi Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Tipe Kepribadian Siswa. Jurnal Education and Development, 9(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v9i1.2228
Montessori, M., Fatmariza, Indrawadi, J., Ambiyar, Tiara, M., & Islami, S. (2024). Neglected Values: Civic Disposition In Junior High Civic Education During The Pandemic. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2300909
Motwani, R., Kaliappan, A., & Chandrupatla, M. (2022). Student Team Achievement Division As A Tool For Peer Assisted Co-Operative Learning In Neuroanatomy. Anatomy & cell biology, 55(4), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.22.122
Ningsih, W. (2023). The Analyst of Interactive Lecturing Approach to Enhance the Students’ Learning Motivation in Higher Education Institutions. Al-Hijr: Journal of Adulearn World, 3(1), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.55849/alhijr.v2i4.563
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Dickinson, W. B., Leech, N. L., & Zoran, A. G. (2009). A Qualitative Framework for Collecting and Analyzing Data in Focus Group Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800301
Poerwati, C. E., Suryaningsih, N. M. A., & Cahaya, I. M. E. (2020). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw II dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Matematika Anak. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(1), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v5i1.496
Rafzan, R., Belladonna, A. P., & Saputra, E. (2024). Improving Critical Thinking Skills In Civic Education Based On Project Citizen Building Awareness Of Environmental Issues. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 21(2), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v21i2.73198
Rahayu, S. M. (2024). Improving the Quality of PKn Learning in Primary Schools Through a Role-Playing Teaching Model. International Journal of Students Education, 284–288. https://doi.org/10.62966/ijose.vi.781
Saragih, S. (2021). Implementation of the STAD Type Cooperative Learning Model to Improve Students’ Motivation and Civics Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 3043–3049. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i5.1238
Sari, T. M., Rismayanti , R., Arya Fitra , R., Ernawati, E., & Pamungkas, R. . (2024). Implementation of the STAD Cooperative Learning Model on Student Learning Activities. BIODIK, 10(3), 441–448. https://doi.org/10.22437/biodik.v10i3.32662
Scales, B. J. (2013). Qualitative analysis of student assignments: A practical look at ATLAS.ti. Reference Services Review, 41(1), 134-147. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321311300956
Sharan, Y. (2010). Cooperative Learning for Academic and Social Gains: valued pedagogy, problematic practice. European Journal of Education, 45(2), 300–313. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40664666
Shofi, A., Fadilah, C. K., Nurfadilah, F., & Mutiasari, T. (2024). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Belajar Di SMPN 2 Telukjambe Timur. Jurnal Tawadhu, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.52802/twd.v8i1.705
Sigalingging, R. H., Harefa, S., & Naibaho, D. (2023). Role of the Discussion Method in Increasing Student Learning Motivation in Christian Education Subjects. Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Dan Inovasi Teknologi, 1(02), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.59653/jimat.v1i02.271
Silva, R., Farias, C., & Mesquita, I. (2021). Cooperative Learning Contribution to Student Social Learning and Active Role in the Class. Sustainability, 13(15), 8644. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158644
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review As A Research Methodology: An Overview And Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sukiyanto, S. (2019). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Active Learning pada Materi Bangun Datar. MUST: Journal of Mathematics Education, Science and Technology, 4(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.30651/must.v4i1.2834
Thomas, H., & Martina, D. (2022). Application Of Cooperative Learning Model In Increasing Students’ Motivation, Learning Participation And Creativity. Educativo: Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(1), Page 314–319. https://doi.org/10.56248/educativo.v1i1.55
Torsdottir, A. E., Olsson, D., Sinnes, A. T., & Wals, A. (2024). The Relationship Between Student Participation And Students’ Self-Perceived Action Competence For Sustainability In A Whole School Approach. Environmental Education Research, 30(8), 1308–1326. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2326462
Zamiri, M., & Esmaeili, A. (2024). Methods and Technologies for Supporting Knowledge Sharing within Learning Communities: A Systematic Literature Review. Administrative Sciences, 14(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14010017
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Khamdan Safiudin (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
